This documentation applies to the 8.1 version of Service Desk, which is in "End of Version Support." You will not be able to leave comments.

To view the latest version, select the version from the Product version menu.

Date fields on the Incident Request form

This topic provides an overview of the date fields on the Incident Request form. Understanding where the dates come from, what they mean, and how they relate to service level agreements (SLAs) can help you to prioritize the incident request assignments.

The Required Resolution Date Time field (Date/System tab) maps to the Date Required field on the Requester console. Someone using the Requester console can use the Date Required field to specify the date or time by which the request should be fulfilled. This is the suggested date or time that the customer wants the request to be fulfilled; no service level workflow is related to this field.

The Target Date field (main section of the Incident form) is the date or time by which the request must be resolved, according to the SLA targets. The Target Date field is set by the BMC Service Level Management application when SLA targets are defined. If SLA targets are not defined, you must set the Target Date field manually.

The Responded Date (Date/System tab) is the date on which the incident request was first responded to. Incident Management populates this field when one of the following conditions occurs:

  • Someone sets the Response field on the Incident Request form to Yes.
  • The incident request is created by a service desk analyst and the based on the value of the entry in the Reported Source field an automatic update of the Responded Date field is triggered.
    For example, if the value of the Reported Source field is Email, the Responded Date field is not updated automatically. However, if the value of Reported Source field is Direct input, the Responded Date field automatically updated.

Note

Under the second condition, Incident Management does not display the Response field.

Other date fields on the Incident Request form — Reported Date, Closed Date, and so on — are completed by the Incident Management system when the milestones represented by the field names occur.

This version of the documentation is no longer supported. However, the documentation is available for your convenience. You will not be able to leave comments.

Comments

  1. Greg Christofferson

    Question, if you manually set theTarget Date on an incident and the date set is exceeded, it does not show up as a breached incident in the reporting....Is this by design?

    Dec 19, 2014 10:14
    1. Bruce Cane

      Hi Greg,

      I think for the breached target date to show up in a report, the target date needs to be populated by the Service Request Management application and not manually, but let me confirm that for you. 

      -Bruce.

       

      Dec 22, 2014 12:06
    1. Bruce Cane

      Hi Greg,

      I've been able to confirm with a subject matter expert that the target date needs to be populated by the SRM application, and not manually for the breached target date to show up in a response.

      Sorry for the delayed in my response, ... it was tough tracking down someone who could answer the question over the holidays.

      -Bruce.

       

      Jan 08, 2015 08:50
  2. Giri G

    what is the functionality behind incident form review by date . when and and want instance this field gets value

    Jan 24, 2017 01:59
    1. Mokshada Shivarekar

      Hi,

      Thanks for inquiring. I will discuss with SME and get back to you.

      Regards,

      Mokshada

      Jan 30, 2017 12:23
    1. Ashok kumar Jha

       Hi,

      I was unable to find the [Review By date] on the Incident form. Which ITSM version you are referring to?

      Can you please post the screenshot for the issue you are referring to. Thanks.

      -Ashok Jha

      Feb 24, 2017 05:56
  3. Giri G

    DB name is Infrastructure chg initiated for Review by Date

    Jan 24, 2017 02:00
    1. Mokshada Shivarekar

       Hi,

      Thanks for inquiring. I will discuss with SME and get back to you.

      Regards,

      Mokshada

      Jan 30, 2017 12:24