Scalabilty and best practices


This topic provides information about performance and scalability test results for this version of PATROL for Linux. The tests are performed in the following scenarios:

Linux to Linux remote monitoring with advanced configuration

In this scenario, Linux remote monitoring was configured by selecting the Advanced Configuration option. All the monitor types (CPU, Memory, Kernel, NFS, Network, Users, Swap, Process, FileSystem, and Disk) were selected in this configuration. 

Hardware details

Platform

Number of remote hosts

Processors

Memory

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server 7.2, PowerPC_POWER7 64-bit

275

2

8 GB

Performance Metrics Summary for full monitoring

Metrics

Average CPU (in %)

Average Memory (MB)
(Working Set)

Network
(Total Bytes In and Out (KB/s))

Remote XPC

0.3

34

222.0

PATROL Agent

0.8

600

Linux to Linux remote monitoring with standard configuration

In this scenario, Linux remote monitoring was configured by selecting the Standard Configuration option. The standard monitor types (CPU, Memory, Network, and File Systems) were selected in this configuration.

Hardware details

Platform

Number of remote hosts

Processors

Memory

Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server 7.0, x86_64

500

4

8 GB

Performance Metrics Summary for full monitoring

Metrics

Average CPU (in %)

Average Memory (MB)
(Working Set)

Network
(Total Bytes In and Out (KB/s))

Remote XPC

2.5

60

240.0

PATROL Agent

3.6

600

Warning

Note

The scalability tests (with advanced and standard configuration) were executed with PATROL Agent history retention interval set to 0 days.

Scalability tests were performed for PATROL Agents configured through TrueSight console only.

 

Tip: For faster searching, add an asterisk to the end of your partial query. Example: cert*

BMC PATROL for Linux 25.3