Limited supportBMC provides limited support for this version of the product. As a result, BMC no longer accepts comments in this space. If you encounter problems with the product version or the space, contact BMC Support.BMC recommends upgrading to the latest version of the product. To see documentation for that version, see BMC AMI Storage Allocation 8.1.

OPTBLKSZ—standard form


The block size of a data set has a direct effect on the storage efficiency of DASD devices.

Generally, the larger block size fits more records on a track, which achieves better utilization of disk space and reduces the number of I/Os that are required to read the data set. Very small data sets might not benefit significantly from the denser record storage. However, because the minimum allocation by z/OS is a single track, allocating larger block sizes is generally more effective. The only disadvantage is that larger block sizes require larger buffers in memory. The following table shows the effect of different block sizes on DASD capacity.

Block size and DASD capacity

Record Density, 3390 DASD, 80-byte records

Block size

Records per track

Records per cylinder

Percentage of space used 1

10720

670

10050

94.6

13680

684

10260

96.6

18400

690

10350

97.4

27920

698

10470

98.5

  1. Source: IBM 3390 Direct Access Storage: Reference Summary (GX26-4577-0)

For more information, see:



 

Tip: For faster searching, add an asterisk to the end of your partial query. Example: cert*