TSO Interval Summary Report


The TSO Interval Summary Report graphically summarizes TSO workload on an interval basis.

The average number of TSO users and either the average response time or the average TSO overhead for the interval are plotted.

The data for this report is obtained from type 20 user records and type 1 CPU records. Type 20 records are generated by the Extractor TSODATA control statement. Type 1 CPU records are generated by the Extractor CPU control statement. This report is produced by using the Analyzer TSOPERF control statement.

Important

If no type 20 records are encountered, this report is not produced.

An example of the TSO Interval Summary Report is shown in the following figure.

PRODUCED BY CMF ANALYZER (v.r.mm  RSL yymm )                     TSO INTERVAL SUMMARY REPORT                      RPTSEQ    31 PAGE    340
BMC SOFTWARE, INC.                                            XYZ COMPANY                              REPORT DATE: DD MMM YY 13.40
 ACTL 10 JUN YY 09.00.00  10 JUN YY 16.00.00             WORLDWIDE HEADQUARTERS                         SYSTEM ID: SJSE     Z v.rr.n


 BASED ON REC TYPE/# RECS/# SAMPLES/REC HOURS:  240-1/28/25.1K/7  240-20/28/25.2K/7
                                                     I N T E R V A L  S U M M A R Y
  INTERVAL   INTERVAL    AVERAGE   AVERAGE   % CPU     0.0       AVERAGE USERS        30.6      0.0          RESPONSE          2.07
    DATE       TIME       USERS    RESPONSE   TSO       +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+       +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
 10 JUN 03   09:00:00      16.1      1.11      0.6      .*****************         I     .       .*****I************              .
             09:15:00      19.1      0.57      0.6      .*********************     I     .       .*****I***                       .
             09:30:00      20.7      0.25      0.4      .**********************    I     .       .**** I                          .
             09:45:00      18.8      0.14      0.3      .********************      I     .       .**   I                          .
             10:00:00      17.8      0.07      0.2      .*******************       I     .       .*    I                          .
             10:15:00      20.6      0.25      0.5      .**********************    I     .       .**** I                          .
             10:30:00      25.9      0.20      0.8      .**************************I*    .       .***  I                          .
             10:45:00      27.8      0.48      1.0      .**************************I***  .       .*****I**                        .
             11:00:00      28.6      0.77      0.4      .**************************I**** .       .*****I******                    .
             11:15:00      29.2      0.32      0.2      .**************************I**** .       .*****I                          .
             11:30:00      30.6      0.75      1.0      .**************************I******       .*****I******                    .
             11:45:00      30.0       ---      0.3      .**************************I*****.       .     I                          .
             12:00:00      30.0      0.28      0.7      .**************************I*****.       .**** I                          .
             12:15:00      30.0      0.22      0.6      .**************************I*****.       .**** I                          .
             12:30:00      29.0      0.75      1.1      .**************************I**** .       .*****I******                    .
             12:45:00      28.8      1.07      0.5      .**************************I**** .       .*****I***********               .
             13:00:00      29.0       ---      0.4      .**************************I**** .       .     I                          .
             13:15:00      28.6      0.76      1.0      .**************************I**** .       .*****I******                    .
             13:30:00      27.8      1.66      1.6      .**************************I***  .       .*****I********************      .
             13:45:00      27.7      0.63      1.6      .**************************I***  .       .*****I****                      .
             14:00:00      26.0      0.57      1.3      .**************************I*    .       .*****I***                       .
             14:15:00      25.1      0.31      0.7      .**************************I     .       .*****I                          .
             14:30:00      26.3      0.86      1.4      .**************************I*    .       .*****I********                  .
             14:45:00      25.2      0.18      0.8      .**************************I     .       .***  I                          .
             15:00:00      24.1      0.11      0.3      .**************************I     .       .**   I                          .
             15:15:00      21.7      2.07      0.3      .***********************   I     .       .*****I***************************
             15:30:00      20.6      0.09      0.1      .**********************    I     .       .*    I                          .
             15:45:00      21.2      0.19      0.5      .***********************   I     .       .***  I                          .
                                                        +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+       +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
             AVERAGES      25.2      0.40      0.7     0.0       AVERAGE USERS        30.6      0.0          RESPONSE          2.07

Fields and data columns are described in the legend of the figure. Dashes (---) are printed in the report to indicate values that were not calculated because of missing record types or zero samples for an interval.

In the following figure, the two graphs at the right show that at the sample interval beginning at 0730 hours, the number of users was 113.7, which was above the average number of users of 101.0. The average response time was 1.13, which was below the average of 1.24 seconds.

Important

When recording at relatively short intervals, the average response time for an interval could be skewed because of a few large response times. For example, a foreground compilation run during a five-minute recording interval could cause an unusually high average response time to be reported.

TSO Interval Summary Report field descriptions

The table below describes each field in the TSO Interval Summary Report.

Field

Description

INTERVAL DATE

start date of measurement interval

INTERVAL TIME

start time of measurement interval

AVERAGE RESPONSE

average response time for all commands issued during measurement interval

Note: This field shows the average response time for all commands issued and not the average response time for TSO as a whole. For example, for a particular CLIST this field shows the average response time for just the commands issued within that CLIST, rather than the average response time for the execution of the entire CLIST.

% CPU TSO

percentage of time during measurement interval that the CPU was busy for a TSO user

(You can plot this value on a self scaling bar graph by specifying PLOT=TSO in the Analyzer TSOPERF control statement. The graph scales to highest value encountered. A column of I’s marks the average TSO/CPU line.)

AVERAGE USERS

average number of active TSO users during the measurement interval

This number of active TSO users is plotted on a self scaling bar graph, which is scaled to highest value encountered. A column of I’s marks average number of active TSO users.

RESPONSE

average response time for all commands issued plotted on a self scaling bar graph; PLOT=RESPONSE must be specified in the Analyzer TSOPERF control statement

The graph is scaled to the highest value encountered. A column of I’s marks average response time.

 

Tip: For faster searching, add an asterisk to the end of your partial query. Example: cert*